Monday, November 23, 2015

Innocent vs Guilty Notes

Sako and Vanzetti were both immigrants that came to the US for a better life.  When they realized that the US was not what they thought it would be, they wanted change, and they joined a group of anarchists the help promote this change.  Anarchists were not against violence, and Sako and Vanzetti participated in bombings against high power officials.  In 1920, Sako and Vanzetti were arrested for murdering two men in South Braintree Massachusetts, and a smaller crime of robbing a payroll truck.  Vanzetti was the only one tried for the robbery of the payroll truck, but they were both tried for the larger crime of murdering two men in South Braintree, Massachusetts.  In the murder, two men approached a manager and guard at slater shoe factory, these men then open fired, killing the manager and guard.  They then escaped with the payroll money.  Vanzetti had already been tried for the payroll truck robbery, and was found guilty, so he was already perceived as a criminal.  The evidence against Vanzetti was that his behavior showed guilt, eyewitnesses placed him at the scene, and his weapon was the bank guard's.  The evidence against Sako was the same, eyewitnesses, behavior, and his weapon.  The problem with this was that none of their evidence had proof behind it, and some of it was even false.  There were 10 eyewitnesses that placed Sako at a different location, and the evidence about the guns was later found to be false (but this was not brought up during the trial).  Even with this questionable evidence, both Sako and Vanzetti were found guilty and sentenced to death.

4 comments:

  1. Your description of the case is very clear and easy to read. I agree that the evidence is questionable, but who do you think is guilty?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it is good how you managed to stay neutral on whether they were guilty or not in your paragraph, but it would have been interesting to see your personal point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like this post because it is simple enough to easily be able to follow, should the reader not know of the two infamous men. And it is really information based, very rich in all of its points that you were trying to get across. I disagree with Millie, I liked how objective it was helped with the informational side of things

    ReplyDelete