The state police wasn’t 100% sure they were involved in the crime
professional robber would never kill someone in an open street
Was making deliveries to italian customers and, witnesses supported that fact
Lies were told for fear of deportation
Vanzetti had a strong alibi, Sacco did not
the gun purchased by the paymaster was not a 32 caliber not a 38, and they carried a 38
the serial # on the guard’s gun did not match
The prosecution lied about certain things
Sacco’s bullet 3 bullet was fired sometimes between in may-december in 1923
“we are innocent”
at no point in the trial was asked if the the murder violated the anarchist beliefs
they were in another place during the murder
Other anarchists confessed that they committed the crime
Madiero provided new informations about the cars
Fuller said they were really guilty
|
Participated in anarchist bombing
“militant revolutionists”
immature robbery attempt
did not take the money
2 unknown men shot 2 CEO’s carrying $15,000
police interrogated them about being anarchists:
Why did they go to the garage to get the car?
Vanzetti looked like the man who shot the man in the “immature robbery”
Vanzetti tried first for lesser offense
Webster thayer: strongly opposed to the case, and believe they
vanzetti: Chose to not testify on his case
Bias Judge
Behavior of the defendant the night of the arrestment
eye witnesses saw him that afternoon by the tree
prosecution’s evidence
Sacco and Vanzetti take the stand
fled to Mexico in 1913
Being anarchists didn’t help
both men were convicted
lowell committee began drafting reports before they had gotten all the evidence
execution time was set at midnight
|
Very interesting graph. It would have also been interesting to include if you believe they are innocent or guilty in a paragraph.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was very helpful that you put jot-dots along the events taken place in chronological order. I also I do agree that it would have been better if you had added your initial thought on whether Sacco and/or Vanzetti were guilty or not. The details along the jot-dots are very descriptive to visualize the case between Sacco and Vanzetti.
ReplyDeleteI like how you did bullet points rather than full sentences. You gave a brief summary and stated how many people now a days look back on this case but aren't sure whether Sacco or Vanzetti were really innocent or guilty. What was your initial thought about this case and what piece of evidence would you have used to back up your answer?
ReplyDeleteI think you have a lot of really good information included in your post. I especially like how you summarized the introduction to the topic before putting your bullet point notes under it. I agree with Tara that putting your personal stance would have been interesting to see.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this post, it reminded me to re visit this worksheet in my studying. You also took down some great notes, and have oodles of information on the trial. Would you say they were innocent or guilty?
ReplyDelete